Lighting Tiles

ABSTRACT

We describe a lighting tile having a substrate bearing an electrode structure, the electrode structure comprising: a plurality of electrically conductive tracks disposed over said substrate; and an electrical connection region connecting to said plurality of tracks; wherein the height of said tracks tapers away from said connection region to compensate for a reduction in luminance from said lighting tile array from the electrical connection region which arises from a non-uniform voltage drop which appears along the tracks in use. Advantageously the tracks are fabricated by electroplating: then, as the rate of deposition is determined by the voltage drop along a track during plating, the height of the deposited tracks, and therefore their resistance, will match the profile required in operation to compensate for the reduction in luminance which would otherwise occur.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to lighting tiles and to organic electronicdevices, and to methods for fabricating such tiles and devices.

BACKGROUND TO THE INVENTION

As described in our patent application GB2482110, a common approach toboost the conductivity of the anode connection of a large-area organiclight-emitting diode (OLED) lighting tile is to use a matrix ofelectrically conductive tracks. As shown in FIG. 1 a, a lighting tile200 generally has (anode) electrode tracks defining a hexagonal orsquare grid 102, with an electrical busbar 104 surrounding the grid (theopening shown is to facilitate connection with the counter electrode).

FIG. 1 b illustrates that within a given area of the tile, the currentprimarily flows through the anode electrode in a single dominantdirection. For example, if the current is supplied from all edges of thetile, the predominant direction of the current is towards the laterallycentral position of the lighting tile. As the highest voltage dropappears at the edges of the lighting tile where electrical busbars areconnected to the tracks, providing more metal at the edges reduces thevoltage drop. However this also generally results in a decrease inaperture ratio. Here the aperture ratio may be defined as: (1—the areaof the electrodes)/(the total active device area).

In GB2482110, we addressed this problem by providing tracks whichsubdivide into a plurality of tracks with increasing distance from abusbar, thus increasing the conductivity towards the electrical busbarswhere greater conductivity is needed. An example of this approach isshown in FIG. 1 c. Furthermore, it is desirable to minimise the voltagedrop across the tile when being in operation, in particular inlarge-area devices. As the light-emitting area of the tile increases,the level of voltage drop for a constant electrical resistance becomesmore apparent. This voltage drop manifests itself in a luminance dropacross the panel.

There remains, however, a general need for improving the luminanceprofile of a lighting tile while maximising the aperture ratio.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to the present invention there is therefore provided alighting tile having a substrate bearing an electrode structure, theelectrode structure comprising: a plurality of electrically conductivetracks disposed over said substrate; and an electrical connection regionconnecting to said plurality of tracks; wherein the height of saidtracks tapers away from said connection region to compensate forreduction in luminance from said lighting tile array from the electricalconnection region.

This approach enables the resistance of the tracks to be matched totheir need to carry current in operation, thus compensating for thenon-uniform voltage drop which appears along the tracks in use, butwithout increasing track width to reduce resistance, which would reduceaperture ratio. The technique may be applied to an organiclight-emitting diode (OLED) lighting tile and to other lighting tiletechnologies, for example a light-emitting electrochemical cell (LEC).For an OLED device, preferably a top-emitting or bottom emitting devicemay be used. It will be appreciated that the benefit of the approach isgreatest with large-area devices, for example having at least onelateral dimension of greater than 1 cm. The lighting tile need not beflat but may be flexible. In embodiments, the height of said trackstapers substantially linearly away from the (external) connection regionor busbar.

There is a particularly advantageous method of fabricating such astructure. During electroplating the rate of deposition of materialdepends on the voltage applied during the process (to a thin seedlayer). If, during electroplating, the voltage driving the process isapplied via the same or a similar connection region or busbar as will beused when the device is in operation, the rate of deposition will bedetermined by the voltage drop along a track during the plating process.In this way the height of the deposited tracks, and therefore theirresistance, will match the profile required in operation to at leastpartially compensate for the previously described reduction in luminancewhich would otherwise occur.

According to a related aspect of the invention there is thereforeprovided a method of manufacturing a lighting tile, in particular of thetype described above, the method comprising: providing a substratebearing a light emitting structure with an electrically conductive seedlayer patterned into tracks; connecting ends of said tracks to anelectrical power supply; and electroplating a layer of electrode metalonto said tracks using current from said electrical power supply.

After the electroplating the height of said tracks tapers away from theconnection region in a manner which compensates for the reduction inluminance from the lighting tile away from the electrical connectionregion. In practice the taper may not be exactly linear because theresistance of a track will also vary as material is deposited, butnonetheless there is a substantial match to the profile needed tocompensate for the luminance reduction which would otherwise arise.After fabrication luminance across said tile may be uniform to betterthan 95%. Optionally any residual non-uniformity may be compensated byadditional variation of the spacing and/or pattern and/or width of thetracks, or equivalently such variation may be employed to relax thetolerance on the track height variation.

The (negative polarity) connection to the track seeds is preferably madevia the connection region or busbar which will be used to provide powerto the device when in operation, though this is not essential.

In embodiments a thin seed layer is deposited and then patterned todefine the track locations, for example by photolithography, and thenthe tracks are deposited by electroplating on the patterned seed layer.Alternatively the initial seeding of the track locations may beperformed by printing the track seeds from solution. A seed layer may bevery thin, for example <5 nm (just a few monolayers thick); for examplea palladium seed may be used to plate copper; a copper seed to platenickel.

A connection to a tile may be, for example, along one edge or around aperimeter of the tile. Any track pattern may be employed—for example aregular rectangular or hexagonal grid, or a pattern in which the trackspacing increases away from a connection point or edge. Thus theaperture ration may vary across the surface of the tile (it may increaseaway from a connection region).

The electrode structure generally further comprises a second,substantially continuous electrode layer beneath the tracks, on saidsubstrate, sandwiching the light emitting material. Thus in embodimentsan average sheet conductance of said tracks varies with distance fromsaid connection region according to a current density in this secondelectrode layer.

The above described techniques need not be restricted to lighting tiles,though they are particularly useful in such applications.

Thus in a further related aspect the invention provides a method offabricating an organic electronic device, the method comprising:providing a substrate bearing at least one organic layer, wherein saidorganic layer is sandwiched between first and second electricallyconductive layers; said first electrically conductive layer comprising agrid of electrically conductive tracks; providing an electrical busbarregion for said grid of electrically conductive tracks, wherein saidbusbar region extends along a lateral edge of said device and whereinsaid tracks extend across said device from said busbar region of saiddevice; and arranging for the height of said electrically conductivetracks to decrease with increasing length of electrical path across saiddevice from said busbar region, with a rate of decrease of heightdefined by electroplating said tracks using a process in which a currentis applied via said electrical busbar region.

As before, the height of the tracks tapers with a taper defined byelectroplating the tracks using a process in which a current is appliedvia the busbar electrical connection region. This turns a disadvantageof electroplating into an advantage, and facilitates the fabrication ofan organic electronic with a high aperture ratio and, in the case of alight-emitting device, with improved luminance.

In embodiments of the tracks are arranged such that the lateral sheetresistance increases away from said electrical connection region, forexample by changing their spacing, width or mutual connection pattern.This facilitates the current being transported over a larger area, andthe luminance profile in a lighting tile embodiment. Generally speaking,in a lighting tile tracks with a height that tapers away from theconnection region may be combined with any other construction in whichthe sheet resistance varies with distance from the connection region. Inone embodiment of the lighting tile, the tracks may generally extendradially from a laterally central position of the lighting tile towardsthe electrical connection region in a “starburst” pattern, so as tofurther decrease the sheet conductance with increasing distance from theconnection region.

The invention also provides an organic electronic device, the devicecomprising: a substrate; an organic layer over said substrate, whereinsaid organic layer is sandwiched between first and second electricallyconductive layers; said first electrically conductive layer comprising agrid of electrically conductive tracks; an electrical busbar connectedto said grid of electrically conductive tracks, wherein said busbarextends along a lateral edge of said device; wherein said tracksgenerally extend across said device from the busbar of said device, andwherein the height of said electrically conductive tracks decreases withincreasing length across the device of electrical path from saidelectrical busbar.

In embodiments the height of said electrically conductive tracksdecreases substantially linearly. Again, the height of the electricallyconductive tracks may decrease with a rate of decline defined byelectroplating the tracks using a process in which a current is appliedvia the electrical busbar. This architecture allows the current to beover a large area in a manner which results in a more uniform luminanceprofile and, in embodiments, a greater aperture ratio (for example theaverage aperture ratio of the organic electronic device may be greaterthan 80%). In embodiments of the organic electronic device the tracksmay generally extend radially from a laterally central position of theorganic electronic device towards the electrical busbar.

Optionally, where the second electrically conductive layer comprises asubstantially continuous electrically conductive layer, this may besufficiently thick to be reflective, which leads to a furtherimprovement in luminance.

The above described aspects and embodiments of the invention apply toboth a top-emission and a bottom-emission device.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other aspects of the invention will now be further described,by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying Figures inwhich:

FIGS. 1 a to 1 d show, respectively, a top-view of a lighting tileexhibiting grids of hexagonal tiled matrices, predominant current flowdirection of the lighting tile, a track pattern with varying lateralsheet resistance, and a cross-section through an OLED lighting tile;

FIGS. 2 a-2 d show, respectively, cross-sectional views of variants ofanode designs on a substrate, and an arrangement for electroplatingtracks of a lighting tile according to an embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 3 illustrates a lighting tile with areas of resistance R1-R6;

FIG. 4 shows luminance uniformity as a function of aperture ratio;

FIG. 5 shows grid height profile for two considered test cases;

FIG. 6 shows effective anode sheet resistance profile for the two testcases of FIG. 5;

FIGS. 7 a and 7 b show, respectively, luminance appearances across thelighting tile in the two test cases;

FIG. 8 shows lighting tile luminance x-cross-section profile for the twotest cases; and

FIG. 9 shows the relative luminance improvement profile along the tilein test case 1 with respect to test case 2.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Embodiments of the invention that we will describe may be used with anytype of lighting tile, including organic light emitting diode(OLED)-based devices and the related, but simpler, light-emittingelectrochemical cell (LEC)-based devices. Embodiments of the inventionmay be used with both so-called bottom-emitting and top-emittingdevices. It is helpful for understanding the invention to brieflyoutline some features of OLED devices.

Organic Light Emitting Diodes

Organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs) may be coloured (red, green andblue) or white. In this specification references to organic LEDs includeorganometallic LEDs, and OLEDs fabricated using either polymers or smallmolecules. Examples of polymer-based OLEDs are described in WO 90/13148,WO 95/06400 and WO 99/48160; examples of so-called small molecule baseddevices are described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,539,507.

Referring to FIG. 1 d, this shows a vertical cross-section through aportion of an OLED lighting tile 10 comprising a glass substrate 12 onwhich metal, for example copper tracks 14 are deposited to provide afirst electrode connection, in the illustrated example an anodeconnection. A hole injection layer (HIL) 16 is deposited over the anodeelectrode tracking, for example a conductive transparent polymer such asPEDOT: PSS (polystyrene-sulphonate-doped polyethylene-dioxythiophene).This is followed by a light emitting polymer (LEP) stack 18, for examplecomprising a PPV (poly(p-phenylenevinylene)-based material: The holeinjection layer helps to match the hole energy levels of this layer tothe anode metal. This is followed by a cathode layer 20, for examplecomprising a low work function metal such as sodium, calcium or bariumwith an optional electron injection layer (not shown), over which isdeposited a reflective back (cathode) electrode 22, for example ofaluminium and/or silver.

The example of FIG. 1 d is a “bottom emitter” device in which light isemitted through the transparent glass or plastic substrate. However a“top emitter” device may also be fabricated in which an upper electrodeof the device is substantially transparent, for example fabricated fromindium tin oxide (ITO) or a thin layer of cathode metal (say less than100 μm thickness).

It is generally desirable to reduce the amount of light obscured by thetracking, more precisely to improve the ratio of the voltage drop acrossa tile to the aperture ratio which is lost to the tracking.

Electrode Profiling

A drawback of the technique outlined in our GB2482110 is that theincreased amount of metal tracking used near the edges blocks a largeramount of light, resulting in a decrease in aperture ratio in theseareas of the lighting tile and therefore reducing efficiency. An exampleof such a regular metal grid, applied laterally on a substrate 202, usedto achieve a specified luminance and voltage drop across a panel areawith aperture ratio AR is shown in FIG. 2 a. A preferred approach isshown in the cross-sectional view of FIG. 2 b, where the amount of openarea is increased by increasing the spacing between the tracks 204. Inorder to keep the conductivity the same as in FIG. 2 a, the height ofthe tracks 204 is increased. The aperture ratio AR1 of the device inFIG. 2 b is therefore greater than AR of the grid shown in FIG. 2 a.

In the present embodiment, we describe a lighting tile 200 in which theaperture ratio can be increased even further while varying the sheetconductance of the tracks 204 laterally in the lighting tile 200. Here,the cross-section of the tracks 204 is varied to achieve an optimumdevice structure by changing the height of the tracks 204 which tapersaway from the connection region (busbar) 206, thus compensating forreduction in luminance from the lighting tile 200 away from theelectrical connection region 206. As shown in FIG. 2 c, the apertureratio AR2 is maximised (AR2>AR1>AR) by minimising the amount of metalused, while minimising the voltage drop away from the electricalconnection region 206 at the edge of the lighting tile 200 when thedevice is being operated.

Advantageously the device structure shown in FIG. 2 c can be prepared byelectroplating, as illustrated in FIG. 2 d. A negative power supply 210is connected to busbar regions 206 around the edge of a tile, attractingthe positive metal ions to pre-prepared seed regions (described furtherbelow). Preferably several connections are made to busbar region 206(though only one is shown).

During plating the current density decreases linearly as current flowsthrough the metal seed layer/growing electrode tracks away from the edgeof the tile 200 due to the resistance of the tracks 204. The height (h)of metal grown during the electroplating process is proportional to thecurrent density (j): hαj. As a result, the height tapers away from theconnection region 206 as shown in FIG. 2 c. This property is what isrequired for compensating for the reduction in luminance from thelighting tile 200 array from the electrical connection region 206 whichwould otherwise occur, and results in a net gain in overall luminancefor a constant efficiency of the lighting tile 200.

During growth of the metal layer, the resistance changes and is lowerwhere more metal has been deposited. Hence, the decrease in height ofthe electrically conductive tracks 204 away from the connection region206 of the lighting tile 200 may deviate slightly from a linearbehaviour when using electroplating. Here, the taper is defined byelectroplating the tracks 204, where a current is applied via theelectrical connection region 206.

The pattern of the metal tracks 204 prepared by electroplating can beobtained by, for example first depositing a seed layer by shadowing,printing from solution or photolithographic methods. There is a varietyof metals and seed layers which can be exploited using this approach. Inthis example, palladium is used as a seed layer for growing coppertracks by electroplating. Copper itself may be exploited as a seed layerfor nickel. The seed layer may be a few monolayers high, in this example5 nm.

The aperture ratio can be increased by preparing narrower metal tracks204. In order to grow high tracks 204, electroplating is particularlyuseful since comparatively large growth rates can be used. The height ofthe metal tracks 204 at the connection region 206 of the lighting tile200 may vary between 50 nm and several μm; the width of the tracks 204may be between 5 μm and 100 μm (the tracks are still substantiallyinvisible at this width); and the spacing between the tracks 204 may bein the range 500 μm to some 10 s of millimeters. The area of thelighting tile 200 is typically larger than 1 cm².

The structure obtained will be an optimisation in terms of sheetconductance during operation and allows for preparation of an anode withmaximum amount of open area for a minimum voltage drop when operatingthe lighting tile. The structure may be exploited in a variety ofelectronic devices, such as, but not limited to organic electronicdevices.

We will now describe the resulting luminance uniformity as a function ofaperture ratio for given OLED device structures.

FIG. 3 shows an example in which the area of an OLED lighting tile issub-divided into a number of effective areas of constant sheetresistance—here for a regular array of hexagonal grids—, i.e. theresistances of the areas are R1=R2=R3 and so forth. FIG. 4 shows theluminance uniformity of an OLED lighting tile as a function of apertureratio for a given OLED device structure. It can be seen that for OLEDlighting tiles with constant aperture ratios across the entire tile(case 1 and case 4), the luminance uniformity decreases with increasingaperture ratio, and vice versa. Both cases 1 and 4 are not optimal andwaste potential open area in the centre of the tile. However, theluminance uniformity over the OLED lighting tile can be improved for alarger effective average aperture ratio if the tile is divided intoareas with, for example R1>R2>R3 (reference is made to FIG. 3). Case 2shows a tile for which 8/9 of the area of the tile has an aperture ratioof 82% and 1/9 of the area has an aperture ratio of 95%. The device ofcase 2 exhibits a luminance uniformity of approximately 91%, and ishigher than the mathematical uniformity of the effective aperture ratioof case 5. This result shows that open area and track width can berelaxed to achieve the same luminance uniformity by dividing the OLEDlighting tile into areas with different resistance, while maintaining alarge effective aperture ratio.

We will now show, by way of modelling, that the average overallluminance increases for a tile in which the anode sheet conductancevaries from high at the connection region where the anode is connectedto a busbar, to low at the point furthest away from the busbar (FIG. 5,TC1), compared to a device with constant anode sheet conductance overthe entire area of the OLED lighting tile (FIG. 5, TC2). Thecorresponding effective anode sheet conductance profile for the case ofTC1 varies in the same linear manner with the grid height which resultsin the effective anode sheet resistance profile as shown in FIG. 6.

In this model, the two test cases refer to devices with the sameaperture ratio of 82%, which allows for a direct comparison of theluminance profile and panel efficiency between TC1 and TC2.The OLEDlighting device exhibits a square tile with a hexagonal grid structure.The width of the tracks and the hexagonal cell height are fixed to 50 μmand 530 μm, respectively, corresponding to an aperture ratio of 82%. Themetal grid height in TC1 varies in ten equal steps in a linear manneralong the tile from 500 nm at the anode contact to 100 nm at thelaterally central position of the tile. In TC2, the metal grid height is300 nm (corresponding to the average height in TC1) and uniform alongthe entire length of the tile. The lateral area of the tiles in TC1 andTC2 are 1.5 cm×1.5 cm. In both cases, the tile is driven with the samevoltage V=4.47 V to achieve a mean luminance of 1000 cd/m2.

In this example, the OLED lighting tile exhibits two electrical contactson two opposite sides of the anode, as well as on two opposite sides ofthe cathode. The cathode is grounded and a voltage is applied to theanode contacts. The typical case of a busbar around the anode forimprovement of the luminance uniformity is not modelled here for sake ofsimplicity. However, the results obtained are applicable to the morepractical case of busbars connected around the entire length of anodeand cathode.

The results of the two test cases are shown in FIG. 7. The two blackbars 702 in FIGS. 7 a and 7 b, respectively, represent the anodecontacts. It can be seen that the luminance profile does not changealong the x-direction in both cases. In the y-direction, however, theluminance varies from approximately 1070 cd/m² near the anode contacts(which is the same for both test cases since the same voltage V=4.47 Vis applied across the OLED device) to approximately 945 cd/m² and 940cd/m2 for TC1 and TC2, respectively. The dashed lines in FIGS. 7 a and 7b, respectively, show where the x-cross section luminance profile istaken. It can be seen that the luminance profile is more uniform in TC1compared to TC2 and the lighting tile appears brighter in TC1. The areawith a lower luminance in the centre extends over a larger portion ofthe tile in TC2 compared to TC1.

FIG. 8 shows the x-cross section luminance profile for the two testcases as indicated by the dashed lines in FIGS. 7 a and 7 b. As theoverall luminance is proportional to the current flowing through theanode, and the current through the anode is larger if the grid height isvaried as described above, the overall luminance is larger for TC1compared to TC2 for the same aperture ratio (82%) and efficiency (0.99)of the OLED device. The non-uniformity figures calculated aredL/Lmax(TC1)=11.6% and dL/Lmax(TC2)=12.1%. This is only a smallimprovement of TC1, and the mean luminance in TC1, Lmean(TC1)=997 cd/m²is only slightly higher than in TC2, Lmean(TC2)=980 cd/m2. However, TC1is the more optimal case as the rate of change in luminance is moremonotonic and at each point along the tile more light will be emitted.

The relative luminance improvement of TC2 compared to TC1 in they-direction is shown in FIG. 9. It can be seen that the total integratedluminance is improved when the sheet resistance profile resulting fromthe varied metal height from the laterally central position of the tileto the connection region is adapted. A summary of performance figures ofTC1 and TC2 is provided in Table 1.

TABLE 1 INPUT SETTINGS AND OUTPUT PERFORMANCE FIGURES OF TEST CASES TC1AND TC2. inputs outputs Simulated Metal Applied material Non- Test GridAspect Thickness Vanode efficacy Uniformity Lmean Panel Case descriptionRatio (%) (nm) (V) (Im/W) (dL/Lmax) (cd/m2) Efficiency TC1 Linear 82 Au(500- 4.47 30 11.60% 997 0.99 change of 100-500) metal grid in 10thickness steps TC2 average gill 82 Au 300 4.47 12.10% 980 0.99thickness for TC1

It is to be noted that the panel efficiency of 0.99 is the same for TC1and TC2 because, although the luminance across the tile is higher forTC1, the current consumed by the OLED increases as well. Thus for thesame driving conditions (the same voltage V=4.47 V applied to the OLEDto achieve the same mean luminance) and the same average conductance,the panel efficiency stays the same.

We have shown that the adapted metal grid sheet resistance and improvedluminance performance allows further freedom in grid design geometry toincrease the aperture ratio. A further improvement may be achieved oncethe aperture ratio is maximised with a grid design with optimal metalheight and height variation by removal of tracks at equipotential lineswhich carry no current, as described in GB2482110. Furthermore, theembodiments described herein, with a change of height of the tracks awayfrom the connection region of the tile, may be combined with designs inwhich a plurality of tracks converge into a single track for increasingdistance from the electrical connection region, and/or the spacingbetween the tracks increases for increasing distance from the electricalconnection region, and/or the width of the tracks decreases forincreasing distance from the electrical connection region, and/or thetracks mutually connect at a laterally central position. These aspectsmay be combined with an architecture of the lighting tile in which thetracks generally extend radially from a laterally central position ofthe lighting tile towards the electrical connection region.

Although we have described an embodiment of the invention in which thefabrication technique we describe is applied to an anode, the skilledperson will recognise that for, say, a top-emission OLED devicelarge-area (transparent) cathode may be fabricated in a correspondingmanner. No doubt many other effective alternatives will occur to theskilled person. It will be understood that the invention is not limitedto the described embodiments and encompasses modifications apparent tothose skilled in the art and lying within the scope of the claimsappended hereto.

1. A lighting tile having a substrate bearing an electrode structure,the electrode structure comprising: a plurality of electricallyconductive tracks disposed over said substrate; and an electricalconnection region connecting to said plurality of tracks; wherein theheight of said tracks tapers away from said connection region tocompensate for reduction in luminance from said lighting tile array fromthe electrical connection region.
 2. The lighting tile as claimed inclaim 1 wherein the height of said tracks tapers substantially linearly.3. The lighting tile as claimed in claim 1 wherein the height of saidtracks tapers with a taper defined by electroplating said tracks using aprocess in which a current is applied via said electrical connectionregion.
 4. The lighting tile as claimed in claim 1 wherein the lightingtile has an aperture ratio of at least 80%.
 5. The lighting tile asclaimed in claim 1 wherein the width of a track decreases withincreasing distance from said electrical connection region.
 6. Thelighting tile as claimed in claim 1 wherein the spacing between saidtracks increases with increasing distance from said electricalconnection region.
 7. The lighting tile as claimed in claim 1 whereinsaid electrode structure further comprises a second, substantiallycontinuous electrode layer beneath said tracks, on said substrate, andwherein an average sheet conductance of said tracks varies with distancefrom said connection region according to a current density in saidsecond electrode layer.
 8. The lighting tile as claimed in claim 1wherein said tracks define a hexagonal grid with a busbar along one ormore edges of the tile.
 9. The lighting tile as claimed in claim 1wherein said tracks generally extend radially from a laterally centralposition of said lighting tile towards said electrical connectionregion.
 10. An organic electronic device, the device comprising: asubstrate; an organic layer over said substrate, wherein said organiclayer is sandwiched between first and second electrically conductivelayers; said first electrically conductive layer comprising a grid ofelectrically conductive tracks; an electrical busbar connected to saidgrid of electrically conductive tracks, wherein said busbar extendsalong a lateral edge of said device; wherein said tracks generallyextend across said device from the busbar of said device, and whereinthe height of said electrically conductive tracks decreases withincreasing length of electrical path across said device from saidelectrical busbar.
 11. The organic electronic device as claimed in claim10 wherein the height of said electrically conductive tracks decreasessubstantially linearly.
 12. The organic electronic device as claimed inclaim 10 wherein the height of said electrically conductive tracksdecreases with a rate of decrease defined by electroplating said tracksusing a process in which a current is applied via said electricalbusbar.
 13. The organic electronic device as claimed in claim 10 whereinsaid second electrically conductive layer comprises a substantiallycontinuous electrically conductive layer.
 14. A method of manufacturinga lighting tile as defined in claim 1, the method comprising: providinga substrate bearing a light emitting structure with an electricallyconductive seed layer patterned into tracks; connecting ends of saidtracks to an electrical power supply; and electroplating a layer ofelectrode metal onto said tracks using current from said electricalpower supply.
 15. The method as claimed in claim 14 wherein, after saidelectroplating, the height of said tracks tapers away from saidconnection region to compensate for reduction in luminance from saidlighting tile away from the electrical connection region.
 16. A methodof fabricating an organic electronic device, the method comprising:providing a substrate bearing at least one organic layer, wherein saidorganic layer is sandwiched between first and second electricallyconductive layers; said first electrically conductive layer comprising agrid of electrically conductive tracks; providing an electrical busbarregion for said grid of electrically conductive tracks, wherein saidbusbar region extends along a lateral edge of said device and whereinsaid tracks extend across said device from said busbar region of saiddevice; and arranging for the height of said electrically conductivetracks to decrease with increasing length of electrical path across saiddevice from said busbar region, with a rate of decrease of heightdefined by electroplating said tracks using a process in which a currentis applied via said electrical busbar region.
 17. The method as claimedin claim 16 wherein the height of said electrically conductive tracksdecreases substantially linearly.